Jump to content

Someone Should Blow Up Masjid Al-Haram


bust
 Share

Recommended Posts

Temple of Bel: Satellite images confirm destruction of famed site in Syria's Palmyra, UN says

 

Tue at 10:55am

6739758-3x2-700x467.jpg

Before and after satellite images show the destruction of the Temple of Bel. (AFP: Unistar-Unosat/Airbus)

"We can confirm destruction of the main building of the Temple of Bel as well as a row of columns in its immediate vicinity," the UN training and research agency UNITAR said, providing satellite images from before and after a powerful blast in the ruins of the ancient city on Sunday.

The blast had already raised fears on Monday that the Islamic State (IS) group had damaged another of the Middle East's most treasured heritage sites.

UNITAR said its satellite program put to rest any doubts that the 2,000-year-old Temple of Bel had been destroyed in the blast.

 

What is the Temple of Bel?

  • The Temple of Bel, also referred to as the Sanctuary of Bel, is among the best preserved of the ruins in Palmyra
  • While little is known about Palmyra's gods, Bel is assumed to be the most important, the equivalent of the Greek Zeus or Roman Jupiter
  • The temple, a mixture of Near Eastern and Roman architecture, is believed to be nearly 2,000 years old, dating back to AD32

A shot taken on August 27 clearly shows an erect, rectangular structure surrounded by columns, while a shot taken on Monday showed there was little left besides a few columns in the very outer edges of the site.

IS already destroyed the smaller Baal Shamin temple at Palmyra last week, confirming the worst fears about their intentions for the site, which they seized from Syrian regime forces in May.

UNITAR on Friday also presented satellite images confirming the destruction of the Baal Shamin temple, which the UN's cultural agency UNESCO called a "war crime".

The jihadists have carried out a sustained campaign of destruction against heritage sites in areas under their control in Syria and Iraq, and in mid-August beheaded the 82-year-old former antiquities chief in Palmyra.

The extremist group's interpretation of Islam considers statues and grave markers to be idolatrous, but it has also been accused of destroying heritage sites to loot items for the black market and to gain publicity.

Known as the "Pearl of the Desert", Palmyra, which means City of Palms, is 210 kilometres north-east of Damascus.

More than 150,000 tourists were visiting Palmyra every year before the Syrian conflict erupted 2011.

Before the arrival of Christianity in the second century, Palmyra worshipped the Semitic god Bel, along with the sun god Yarhibol and lunar god Aglibol.

Syria's antiquities chief Maamoun Abdulkarim described the Temple of Bel as Palmyra's most important site, and also the most important temple in the Middle East along side Baalbek in Lebanon.

Construction on the temple began in 32 BC and ended in the second century, and it later served as both a church and a mosque.

6736964-3x2-700x467.jpg

The Temple of Bel was described as one of the most important temples in the Middle East. (Reuters: Omar Sanadiki)

AFP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No - they don't work that way, actualy all the "satellite" photo's you see in Google Maps etc are actually taken from planes. Just doesn't sound sexy. EO satellites won't have the same time over the same spot. ALSO even if they did, the second photo would be in the same clarity and resolution as the first. Even the first photo could be a bit higher rez. It's mostly bull shyte that satellites can read number plates, but there would be people around there that would have also left shadows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be VERY polite here, and point out that the people who know what modern surveillance satellites can really do are NOT allowed to discuss those things in open forums like this one.

 

I spent some time working on unclassified FLIR (thermal imaging) technology. At one point, I had to do some testing, that involved seeing how small a temperature difference it could distinguish. I was amazed at the results.

 

Add to that that this was a FLIR that had NOT been carefully tweaked for best response. This was a quick and dirty test, on an experimental image processing technique.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...